For Whom the Bell Tolls or Big Ben's Travesty

Media_httpdanielmrose_grbct
I am a sports guy. I love Sportscenter and follow the NFL, MLB, and NHL.  I have always admired the way that the Pittsburgh Steelers have handled their business.  I am becoming more and more impressed with the way that Roger Goodell the commissioner of the NFL is conducting his. Unless you have been living under a rock you know that Ben Roethlisberger has been suspended by the NFL under its player conduct policy. Many of the sports talking heads are decrying this as "legislating morality".  I think that there is a different issue here though.  This is the first time that the NFL has suspended someone who has not been brought up on criminal charges.  The letter that Goodell sent was direct and clear.  The behavior of this player falls outside the standards that the NFL desires to hold its players too. I think that what we have in this instance is not a "legislation of morality".  It is simply a private company stating that it believes working for it is a privilege and that there is an expectation of a certain standard of behavior. Accountability is something that has been largely in our society at large.  We are offended by the concept because it assumes that there is a right way and a wrong way to conduct oneself.  This then requires that there is a standard or an authority by which we will be judged.  To be judged is immoral. The hypocrisy of the talking heads is amazing.  When a religious leader is found to be immoral the culture screams for punishment.  When an athlete is found to immoral the culture screams for forgiveness.  It seems that what we need is integrity in our judgment of public figures. Roger Goodell is doing things right.  It is an honor to play a boys game for millions of dollars.  Those who work for the NFL should be held to a higher standard and that standard is rightly determined by the league. What about the church?  Are we doing things right? What can we learn from Goodell and the NFL?  I think that we can learn much if we would just open our eyes.  Hit me up in the comments with thoughts about what the church can learn, if anything.

It's MY RIGHT!

Media_httpdanielmrose_bjrdi
"Just because something is technically legal doesn't mean that it's spiritually appropriate. If I went around doing whatever I thought I could get by with, I'd be a slave to my whims."  - Eugene Peterson The refrain, "It's my right!" rings our everywhere today in our culture.  Whether it's in demand of entitlements or freedom from regulation.  Regardless, our "rights" are something that we constantly demand.  The quote from Peterson is actually 1 Corinthians 6:12 from the Message.  This verse will be the final one that we look in our conversation about freedom and the law. It is used almost always to support the freedom of a person and their use of freedom.  Based on Peterson's rendering we are left scratching our heads as to "why?" Well, consider the traditional translation from the ESV, ""All things are lawful for me," but not all things are helpful. "All things are lawful for me," but I will not be enslaved by anything." So, when we read this often we think, "Yes, I can do anything!" This leads us to a place of license.  However, Peterson's rendering provides us with the correct sense.  There are things that we should not do because they harm us spiritually.  1 Corinthians 6-9 is a fascinating section of Scripture where Paul lays out many issues regarding freedom.  To work through all of it would be too lengthy. So here are a couple of bullet points:
  • Paul wants the Corinthians to realize that there is more to life than what they see.  Their bodies are going to be resurrected and bought with a price. Freedom is limited by the statement, "So glorify God in you body. (6:20)"
  • Freedom is determined by knowledge of God (8:1-2).
  • Freedom is limited by concern for the brother's conscience (8:12)
  • The freedom which Paul is directly dealing with is in regards to food laws (6-8)
  • Freedom in relation to personal association is doggedly protected (9:19-23)
  • Freedom is determined by ones own understanding of the gospel (9:19)
In short, we have no "rights".  We cannot do anything we want because we are constrained by love for our brothers.  We cannot do anything we want because we are constrained by love for our Savior.  We cannot do anything we want because we are constrained by our desire to glorify God. However, we are also free to love well.  To enjoy the creation.  To engage the culture in all its fullness.  We are free to "become all things to all people" without fear of condemnation.  We are free to speak the language of the common man and to enter into his world. I think that as we close this conversation about freedom and law we must realize that in Christ we are free.  The measure that we use this freedom is direct correlation to our understanding of grace.  If we are free, really free, then we can also choose to protect the weaker brother. We are also to help one another grow in knowledge and experience of the gospel.

Strong, weak, what!?

Our journey through freedom and the law is coming to a close, for now.  I think this is the second to last post on the issue before we turn our attention to Baptism and Communion. The passage that I am interested in today is Romans 14. This is where we find the famous, "Therefore, let us not pass judgment on one another any longer, but rather decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother. (Romans 14:13). This is a section that I think has been done great harm and violence in Christian circles because it is so often read through a grid of legalism.  Where do we begin?  First, the core issues that Paul raises here are those of food laws.  It seems that what we had in Rome was a church comprised of a variety of different people as one would expect in a cosmopolitan city.  This caused great tension within the community as they bumped into one another's understandings of how they were to interact with God and what it meant to live all of life in a way that brings honor to God.
Media_httpdanielmrose_fngfi
Paul finds that there were two camps, the weak and the strong.  The weak only ate vegetables (as these were safe from being offered to idols) and the strong ate anything.  Paul in verse 3 argues that neither are despise the other.  Pauls says in verse 5 that "Each one should be fully convinced his own mind." He drives the point home in verse 12, "So then each of us will give an account of himself to God." It is with this context that we arrive at verse 13.
Media_httpdanielmrose_fdfjt
Many of the commentators argue that 13b (decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother) is pointed at the "strong".  The reasoning comes from the fact that verse 15:1 says, "We who are strong have an obligation to bear with the failings of the weak." I think that this is accurate.  The question then becomes what is the scope of the passage? Is Christian freedom to be held to the lowest common denominator across the board? No. First, Paul argues on behalf of the strong.  He desires for all to become strong and leave weakness behind.  The reason for this is that these issues are faith issues.  Paul's desire is for the people of God to fully engage in all that God has made clean in faith. He says, "Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he [God] approves (22)." Second, Paul changes the issue.  He says, "For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Whoever thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men (17-18)." Paul is telling them that their focus is off base.  These issues of food and festivals are silly compared to the work of the kingdom. Finally, Paul calls for the strong to "bear" the "failings" of the weak.  This is language that drives one to realize that Paul's desire is for change.  The term "bear" is βαστάζω and is understood as "be able to bear up under especially trying or oppressive circumstances (BDAG)."  This is insightful. Consider what Paul is saying.  The weak are "especially trying" in their "failings".  Paul gets that those who would rob the strong of their freedom are "trying" and even "oppressive". His desire is for them not to stay that way.  He wants them to become strong. But, until that time the strong are love well and not judge. What is the take home then?  It means that those who see Christians exerting their freedom ought not pass judgment (14:3) and realize that they are weak (14:2) and ask the strong for help that they might not stay in that state.  It also means that the strong must hang in there in the midst of the frustrations that come from the weak and love well.  They must not flaunt their freedom or force the weak into living freely until they can do so in faith. Paul says it well, "Therefore welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God. (Romans 15:7)"

By no means!

Media_httpdanielmrose_jvgej
I think that some of my favorite moments in the Bible are when the apostle Paul gets worked up. As you read you can almost feel the juices flowing inside Paul.  I imagine his forehead sweating and his face turning red.  I can see him pacing and flailing his arms as if he would be mute without them.  Then the climactic moment comes and his hands go to the forehead, veins popping, eyes clenched, and BOOM, a statement and a torrent of questions exploding! This is the image I get as I read Romans 5 and 6. What concerns us today is Romans 6:15-23 (The Message):
15-18So, since we're out from under the old tyranny, does that mean we can live any old way we want? Since we're free in the freedom of God, can we do anything that comes to mind? Hardly. You know well enough from your own experience that there are some acts of so-called freedom that destroy freedom. Offer yourselves to sin, for instance, and it's your last free act. But offer yourselves to the ways of God and the freedom never quits. All your lives you've let sin tell you what to do. But thank God you've started listening to a new master, one whose commands set you free to live openly in his freedom!19I'm using this freedom language because it's easy to picture. You can readily recall, can't you, how at one time the more you did just what you felt like doing—not caring about others, not caring about God—the worse your life became and the less freedom you had? And how much different is it now as you live in God's freedom, your lives healed and expansive in holiness? 20-21As long as you did what you felt like doing, ignoring God, you didn't have to bother with right thinking or right living, or right anything for that matter. But do you call that a free life? What did you get out of it? Nothing you're proud of now. Where did it get you? A dead end. 22-23But now that you've found you don't have to listen to sin tell you what to do, and have discovered the delight of listening to God telling you, what a surprise! A whole, healed, put-together life right now, with more and more of life on the way! Work hard for sin your whole life and your pension is death. But God's gift is real life, eternal life, delivered by Jesus, our Master.
I like the way that Peterson's translation renders this passage because I think that it gets down to the heart of the matter. Verse 15 is rendered like this in the ESV, "What then? Are we to sin because we are not under law but under grace? By no mans!"  Paul is anticipating his detractors.  He is assuming what they are going to say before they say it.  Remember, Paul did not physically write this letter, he dictated it to Tertius.  I imagine that Tertius played the proverbial devil's advocate for Paul so that there could be a give and take. This was meant to be a conversation not a treatise. Consider here what Pauls is doing.  He is preempting the person who would say that the radical grace that he is describing thus far is will lead to license.  Paul argues quite the opposite.  He argues that as a result of the freeing from the curse of the law there will be new found freedom to truly live the way that a person was made to live. I love how Peterson puts this, "But now that you've found you don't have to listen to sin tell you what to do, and have discovered the delight of listening to God telling you, what a surprise! A whole, healed, put-together life right now, with more and more of life on the way! Work hard for sin your whole life and your pension is death. But God's gift is real life, eternal life, delivered by Jesus, our Master." There is delight and joy in living the life of hearing from God. I hate money. It's annoying and it preoccupies too much of my time and other people's time.  I remember when I first heard about budgets and I thought, "Ugh, that seems restrictive and annoying."  But, then my bride and I created a budget.  You know what we discovered?  It gave us freedom.  Prior to a budget we did not believe that we could go on dates because we did not have money.  Once we created a budget we found the freedom to date again.
Media_httpdanielmrose_khalj
I think this is how grace works.  When we are living lives separated from God we look at the "good two shoe" Christians and think "Ugh, that seems restrictive and annoying."  But, then our hearts are captured by the radical grace of God and we find that we have freedom to live life to its full.  We find that we can do all things to the glory of God and in so doing experience great freedom. Yet, this freedom is contained within the confines of grace and glory. This weekend Tiger Woods returned to the links.  He played well, no, he played really well.  Consider though the pain and agony that he suffered and his family suffered while he "did whatever he wanted" and as some sports hosts put it, "lived every man's fantasy."  I guarantee you that Woods would trade every one of his sexual escapades for the freedom of a happy monogamous marriage with Elin. Freedom comes from living out the reality that we were made for good and for God. This is the beauty of grace and living in light of righteousness.

Are you gonna eat that?

Media_httpdanielmrose_cmbgg
We had been walking for a week straight.  The pace was incredible.  We did not even feel like they had homes any more because we were always on the move.  This is the way it always was. There was a constant pressure to move on to the next town and to continue proclaiming the "good news".  Saturday was always the hardest day.  Usually there was no way to prepare and have extra food on hand so Saturday was a hungry day. Today, was especially tough though.  Our travels took us through a grain field! It was excruciating. But, to our astonishment the Teacher grabbed the head of a grain rubbed it in his hands and ate the kernel.  We looked at one another, confused, it was the Sabbath wasn't it? But, the Teacher picked and ate.  We did too. Then "they" showed up. The religious, the high and mighty Pharisees.  They were always around.  They said, "Your disciples are breaking the Sabbath rules!" The Teacher's response was amazing, "Really? Didn't you ever read what David and his companions did when they were hungry, how they entered the sanctuary and ate fresh bread off the altar, bread that no one but priests were allowed to eat? And didn't you ever read in God's Law that priests carrying out their Temple duties break Sabbath rules all the time and it's not held against them? There is far more at stake here than religion. If you had any idea what this Scripture meant—'I prefer a flexible heart to an inflexible ritual'—you wouldn't be nitpicking like this. The Son of Man is no lackey to the Sabbath; he's in charge." Then we went into the Synagogue for worship.  When we got there "they" thought they had the Teacher trapped because there was a crippled man there. "They" asked, "Is it legal to heal on the Sabbath?" The Teacher got them again, "Is there a person here who, finding one of your lambs fallen into a ravine, wouldn't, even though it was a Sabbath, pull it out? Surely kindness to people is as legal as kindness to animals!" Then he said to the man, "Hold out your hand." He held it out and it was healed. "They" walked out furious, sputtering about how they were going to ruin Jesus. (Based on Matthew 12:1-14, with a little help from the Message) -- This is an amazing story.  It's really a central text for our question about freedom and law. The law said, "Observe the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Work six days and do everything you need to do. But the seventh day is a Sabbath to God, your God. Don't do any work—not you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your servant, nor your maid, nor your animals, not even the foreign guest visiting in your town. For in six days Godmade Heaven, Earth, and sea, and everything in them; he rested on the seventh day. Therefore God blessed the Sabbath day; he set it apart as a holy day." The Pharisees were somewhat right in their questioning of Jesus and the disciples.  In their minds they really were breaking the sabbath commandment. But Jesus response flips their understanding of the commandment on its head, "the Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath". Brilliant!  He even says that the disciples in this case are guiltless!  He goes so far as to point out that they missed the point of the command when he quotes Hosea 6:6. In Hosea God has his people in the dock and calling them to account.  The Pharisees would have felt the sting. Jesus was calling them out as heartless and completely disconnected from God himself. In their quest to be faithful to God the Pharisees had missed God's heart and his desire for them to worship.  I think we are guilty of this.  What are the rules that you have put in place to be faithful to God? Maybe some of these ring true:
  • No R rated movies.
  • No secular music.
  • No smoking.
  • No drinking.
  • No dating.
  • No being a Democrat.
  • No being a Republican.
  • No being Pro-Choice.
  • No being Pro-Life.
  • No watching MSNBC.
  • No rooting for Ohio State University (OK, this is mine, I admit it.  I think God's OK with it.)
Freedom is about worship.  Freedom is about coming to the God of the universe and being with him and with his people. There are no longer divisions.  The boundary markers of in and out are changed they are now spiritual and communal.  They are no longer based on law. What's your list?  How does it need to change? Are you building barriers on behalf of God? Are you OK with God's dismantling of barriers through the crucifixion of Jesus?

That Dirty Rotten...oh, Really!?

Media_httpdanielmrose_ijydu
We spent some time looking at Jesus' discussion about fulfilling the law.  Now, I want to look at another of the stories that bring to the forefront the issue of freedom and the law. This one is found in Matthew 8:5-13:
“When he entered Capernaum, a centurion came forward to him, appealing to him, “Lord, my servant is lying paralyzed at home, suffering terribly.” And he said to him, “I will come and heal him.”But the centurion replied, “Lord, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof, but only say the word, and my servant will be healed. For I too am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. And I say to one, ‘Go,’ and he goes, and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes, and to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.” When Jesus heard this, he marveled and said to those who followed him, “Truly, I tell you, with no one in Israel have I found such faith.I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven,while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”And to the centurion Jesus said, “Go; let it be done for you as you have believed.” And the servant was healed at that very moment.”
You might be asking "what does this have to do with freedom and the law?"  I think that has everything to do with freedom and the law.  A Roman Centurion, the very image of imperial power comes to Jesus, a backwoods, Jewish rabbi and asks him to heal his servant.  The word "appealing" is παρακαλῶν and it really is pointing to an "urgent exhortation".  Eugene Peterson renders it, "came up in a panic".  I think that this is a great picture.  How humiliating it would have been.  Then this Centurion, this image of Rome's great power and might did the unthinkable, "Lord, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof."  Truly, a remarkable image for those standing around watching.  Rome was yielding authority to a Jewish rabbi.  Incredible! Jesus' comment is even more amazing!  He uses this as an opportunity to teach that the Kingdom is open to people such as this: tools of the Emperor's oppressive regime will be invited to table fellowship with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob!  This is remarkable!  The violent, oppressive Gentiles are invited to the table? The sons of the kingdom are thrown into outer darkness? How can this be? Luke's account gives us a bit more insight into the matter:
“After he had finished all his sayings in the hearing of the people, he entered Capernaum. Now a centurion had a servant who was sick and at the point of death, who was highly valued by him. When the centurion heard about Jesus, he sent to him elders of the Jews, asking him to come and heal his servant. And when they came to Jesus, they pleaded with him earnestly, saying, “He is worthy to have you do this for him, for he loves our nation, and he is the one who built us our synagogue.” And Jesus went with them. When he was not far from the house, the centurion sent friends, saying to him, “Lord, do not trouble yourself, for I am not worthy to have you come under my roof. Therefore I did not presume to come to you. But say the word, and let my servant be healed. For I too am a man set under authority, with soldiers under me: and I say to one, ‘Go,’ and he goes; and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes; and to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.” When Jesus heard these things, he marveled at him, and turning to the crowd that followed him, said, “I tell you, not even in Israel have I found such faith.”And when those who had been sent returned to the house, they found the servant well.”
(Luke 7:1–10 ESV)
We learn now that the Centurion is a man who loved the Jews. He even built their synagogue.  It appears that this Centurion was a "God-fearer".  Most likely he was a not a convert to Judaism or the Jewish Elders would have made that clear to Jesus. This was a man who believed in God.  His faith was such that he could not bear to have Jesus enter his home. He was "poor in spirit" and he would come to inherit the kingdom! Jesus was free to heal and forgive this man.  He was free to invite him to table fellowship with the patriarchs.  The law said otherwise (or one would assume so).  Freedom is again found in the breaking down of barriers between people and God.  This Roman Centurion had great faith and could happily receive the fellowship of the great cloud of witnesses without worry because, "for freedom Christ set us free." This Centurion was the very image of the world and all of its trappings.  He had money, power, and authority.  Yet, his humble faith found him a place at the table.  Our freedom comes from humility and it is in this humility that we can sup with "the world".  It is with humility that we can be "in the world" and "not of the world."  We enter in with those around us freely because the table is open and any may come to it. Grace has bought a spot for any who would trust in the faithfulness of Jesus.

The Dawn Breaks: Freedom Breaking Through

Media_httpdanielmrose_alfsy
We have evaluated the great verse on freedom, Galatians 5:1 and now I want to go back.  I want to look a the first in-breaking of freedom in the gospel of Matthew. We find it in Matthew 5:17-20:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:17–20 ESV)
This passage is insightful for us to begin getting a sense of Jesus's thoughts on the law and of freedom. This passage from Matthew is unique, it is not found in the other synoptics or John (Luke 16:14-17 might be considered parallel but is so different that this is unlikely).  However, there is a very clear allusion to this passage in Romans 10:4, "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”  Paul's epistle to the Romans came prior to Matthew's writing of the gospel.  Matthew was also very likely to be from Anitoch (which was Paul's sending community).  I think that we should be mindful of the influence of Paul and Matthew and Matthew on Paul.  This reality will help us to determine in greater depth what is going on here in the narrative. This passage is in the heart of the "Sermon on the Mount" and Jesus is speaking to the masses.  Verse 17 is critical as it sets up the rest of the teaching, "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them."  Why does Jesus say this?  It is because he is setting the stage for what will follow where he says, "You have heard it said...But I tell you..."  Jesus is making clear that he is in no way setting aside the Older Testament.  He is taking it to the next level. There are some disconcerting comments made in this passage.  First, anyone who relaxes the law will be called least in the kingdom and to enter the kingdom of heaven you have to have greater righteousness than that of the Pharisees.  This is an incredible statement!  The Pharisees were amazingly righteous men.  They had laws upon laws to make sure that they never broke a single law.  The Pharisees fasted, prayed, and gave.  They knew the Scriptures better than anyone (well except for Jesus, since he inspired them and all that!  This is a hard teaching. But, we have the rest of the story.  Two key words that I want to point out: πληρῶσαι and γένηται these are the terms that we translate as "fulfill" and "accomplished".  These are key for us who have the rest of the story.  πληρῶσαι is the Aorist Active Infintive.  The aspect of the Aorist is a completed work.  Jesus is saying that he will complete the fulfilling  of the law and prophets.  How can he do this? He can do this living a perfect life.  He goes on to say that nothing will pass away from the Law until all is accomplished.  All what? All the Law.  Jesus did this.  In himself he did all the law, he fulfilled it.  In a singular moment he brought about the final and perfect fulfillment of the Law. I hope the logic here is becoming clear.  The righteousness that he talking about, the greater righteousness is his own. There is no hope of living the Law with perfection.  One cannot do it apart from divine aid.  The divine one, the God-man himself is the only one who can bring about this fulfillment.  Therefore, as we trust in his faithful fulfillment we find our righteousness. Remember Romans 10:4, "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes." The dawn is breaking.  The Law and the Prophets are fulfilled in Christ.  We move from here to begin to see this reality played out on the stage of life. But, that's for the next post.

You Can't DO THAT! YES I CAN! NO YOU CAN'T!!!

Media_httpdanielmrose_htdie
Yesterday we began exploring Galatians 5:1, "For freedom Christ has set us free, stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery."  We explored the historical and literary context a bit.  Today, I want to draw some conclusions regarding freedom. The key word in the verse is "freedom".  It is ἐλευθερίᾳ in the Greek text in the dative.  ἐλευθερία is a word that that at its heart means liberty in the context of becoming free from slavery. Why is it in the dative? What is the purpose of this case here?  This is the dative of interest which is a subset of the indirect object (Wallace, 143).  This means that Christ set the Galatians free "for the benefit" of freedom. Think about this for a moment.  Christ set them free.  Why? He set them free so that they would experience freedom. This means that they were, at some point, not free.  What were they not free from?  To what were they enslaved? Remember Paul is discussing in Galatians what it means to be "in Christ".  How can someone know they are in the community as opposed to be outside of the community. The Galatian converts were confused and needed direction. They turned to the other community of "the Book" and were informed that they needed to follow certain rituals.  These rituals concerned table fellowship, festivals, and circumcision.  These boundary markers, that have been thoroughly discussed by Wright, Dunn, Schreiner, and others, are the very things that are causing Paul such consternation. The Galatians were becoming enslaved to boundaries of in/out that were obliterated in the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. In chapters three and four Paul laid out the differentiation between the law and the promise.  Now he brings them to the point of action where they must realize that these laws are not necessary for them to interact with God. They do not need to become Jewish to be in Christ.  Christ has set loose the boundaries of who is in and who is out. There is now freedom to live as they are in Christ. Freedom here, therefore, is a liberation from a law which mandated one  identify oneself by doing certain activities. The community of the people is open and free, the boundary markers have been shifted (baptism and communion, another series of posts coming soon).  The outworking of being "justified" is inclusion or exclusion from the community of God.  One cannot be "in the camp" if they are not justified.  Justification prior to Christ came through the law, the following of mandated requirements to show that one was in the community of faith.  Christ's coming freed humanity from this stricture because he himself fulfilled these requirements and provides a means by his crucifixion and resurrection to enter into the community by faith alone, trusting in his finished work. Paul anticipates the critics, "Freedom leads to license!"  Not so, says Paul.  This freeing from the old boundaries frees us "through love to serve one another. (5:13b)" Why?  The freedom from boundary markers that separate one people from another allows us to love all those that come across our paths.  We no longer have to concern ourselves with the issues that drove Jesus's parable of the good Samaritan. Summary idea: Freedom in Galatians 5:1 is the freedom for anyone to be in God's community and for us to relate to God as who we are and to serve anyone regardless of who they are.