Your GPS is Broken

Missional Map-Making: Skills for Leading in Times of Transition is one of those books that jumped out at me as one that I needed to read. First, it was penned by Alan J. Roxburgh who has been a key player in the missional movement for a very long time. Second, the title alone highlights the fact that Roxburgh is not just talking recipes but is seeking to dive deeper into the heart of what is happening in the church today. The text is broken out into two parts. The first is entitled, "When Maps No Longer Work". In this first part Roxburgh makes a cogent argument that the world is not changing but has changed. The shift has occurred and our culture has moved from the "enlightenment/modern" understanding of the world to the "post-modern". This means that our entire way of understanding the cultural terrain is broken. Roxburgh uses maps as his key metaphor. He argues that each of us have internal maps to help us navigate our daily meanderings through life in this broken world. This is the primary function of worldview. They are to provide us the means by which to make sense of the world around us. But what happens when the world is no longer what it once was? What happens when the maps no longer work? This is catastrophic when it comes to leadership. Roxburgh makes great connections from the business world and from the world of philosophy to make his point that leaders must not use the old maps but must be willing to change their maps so that they can lead the community of God's people toward reaching a lost world. I think one of the best arguments he makes is in chapter 7 where he discusses the development of the internet and compares it to the culture at large. The internet was initially a linear connection of a handful of super-computers. It is now an interconnected web with no beginning or ending. This is true of our culture. The boundaries are being erased and as a result we struggle to even speak "multi-culturalism" or "pluralism" because inherent to both are boundaries. The boundaries are disappearing, so argues Roxburgh, so what will the church do about it? Part two, "The Map Making Process" seeks to answer that question. There are four key components to building a new map that Roxburgh discusses. The first is to assess and understand the changes that have taken place in your community. Unless we have a firm understanding of the lay of the land it will be very difficult to draw a new map. We must become surveyors of the new landscape. The second is the cultivation of a core identity. This core identity is developed from the Biblical narratives and calls people to a renewed confidence. It is a pushing down to the "regular folks" the mission of God and removing it from the hands of the "pros". The third is the "cultivation of parallel cultures in the kingdom". This means that we must ease change into being by living out the new culture alongside those in the old. As more and more people live off the new map the old map will give way. While this is requires patient and slow change it is the way of love. The fourth are "partnerships between a local church and neighborhoods and communities." Roxburgh argues for the church to partner within its neighborhood to meet real needs and to care for the community within which it resides. These partnerships will help the church to ask the right questions and begin to draw an even more proper map for it's world. Conclusion This is a great text. It's strength lies in the critique of contemporary church culture's ability to engage with a changed world. It's weakness lies in application. While Roxburgh provides some good stories, the reader is left wondering, "How?". I was expecting this from the start (thanks to a very well done introduction). The truly engaged leader will be spurned on to creativity and thoughtfulness.

Book Review: Surviving Your Serengeti: 7 Skills to Conquering any Business Challenge

Surviving Your Serengeti: 7 Skills to Conquering any Business Challenge.  It was given to me by a friend who said, "You have to read this.  It's pretty great." I was looking forward to reading it because I had already taken the leadership style inventory that goes with the book and found out that I was a "Wildebeest". That didn't seem very inspiring. You can read that last comment as "I was a bit skeptical".  I have read many books on leadership.  I could list them for you but, my fingers would stop working. Swanepoel, has however, brought a unique twist to the game.  He identifies seven key skills that a person needs to succeed in the Serengeti of leadership. I am a pastor and so I read Swanepoel's parable of the Serengeti through a bit of a different lens. I am not very interested in making a lot of money.  What I am interested in is making an impact. A big impact. As I read I tried to imagine the Serengeti of church leadership and how the skills of the strategic lion, the enterprising crocodile, the enduring wildebeest (me!), the risk-taking mongoose, the communicating elephant, the efficient cheetah, and the graceful giraffe, would play out in our community. The reality is that all of them, as Swanepoel states, are necessary.  The skills that he highlights are at the principle level and cross the chasms business, education, non-profit, and wherever else leadership is needed. I deeply appreciated the fact that in the Serengeti you could not go it alone.  Each of the skills worked together for the survival of the whole.  This is true in the church context as well. We must have teams who lead together. These teams must recognize the giftedness of the players and embrace one another's special role. I recommend you take a peak and think about what it would take to survive your Serengeti.
Media_httpdanielmrose_esefc
THE ENDURING WILDEBEEST
Like the wildebeest, endurance for us in its simplest form is the ability to exert ourselves for relatively long periods of time. More specifically, it’s all about the ability to withstand hardship and stress. We need to remain steadfast and persistent in the face of obstacles. It‘s often not the fastest nor the strongest one that wins the race, it’s the one that stays the course and goes the distance.

Lead, lead, lead...

Media_httpdanielmrose_caewq
Yesterday I committed myself to watching The NINES leadership conference.  I set up the laptop with the projector and big screen and kicked back in our youth room. I was impressed with the variety of speakers and the depth of insight that was being presented.  I was less than surprised by some of the poor exegesis.  I was able to invest in about half the conference.

Read the rest of this post »

The Quest to Be Unconventional

Media_httpdanielmrose_igxam
I like to think.  I like to think new things and seek to develop original ideas.  I also enjoy reading and interacting with those who think in fresh ways.  One of the people who I enjoy reading is David Fitch.  He is a missiologist who is calling the church to be local and missional. He understands that the gospel needs to be contextualized to particular local contexts without undermining its narrative truth. That being said, I think that David does something in a recent post which is not authentic. He is discussing how to deal with conflict in the community of believers.  He evaluates two approaches which are highlighted in the work of Al Mohler and Brian McLaren.  He argues that neither of their approaches (autocratic or democratic) fit with the biblical model and he calls for a "new" approach, the incarnational. I want to briefly summarize this approach:
  • People in disagreement are encouraged to discuss one on one.
  • If there is continued disagreement three or four are brought together.
  • If there is continued disagreement the acknowledged leaders are brought into the conversation.
  • If there is continued disagreement the issue is brought before the whole church.
If this sounds strangely familiar it is because it is.  This is what we find in Matthew 18.  It is also the methodology outlined in the Book of Order for the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. I appreciate that David is calling the church back to this reality.  I agree with his conclusions. What I struggle with is that he encapsulates the call in language that makes it sound like a "new" thing. I think we need to be careful about a quest for the unconventional that does not credit the past rightly.  I also think that we need to look around and notice that many of the processes put in place by those who have come before us are good and helpful.

Give it away, Give it away, Give it away now!

Media_httpdanielmrose_dcpce
I love the moment when an idea flashes in my mind and I grab hold of it and it turns into something worthwhile. This happened a number of weeks ago when I was hanging out with a friend of mine named Zak.  I was asking him about his friends and what kind of context they would most likely come out to for a conversation about spiritual things. He said that a coffee house would be best.  In that moment, what would come to be called Coffee/Doubt, was born. An idea became a vision which became a mission. Things started slow but momentum has been growing and continues to grow.  The beautiful thing though is that it's not really mine.  It's Zak's.  He own this things.  Last Thursday there were sixteen adults and kids sitting at Starbucks for a conversation and Zak led it.  Zak is a 16 year old guy who gets fat lips in mosh-pits and has two rings in his lower lip.  He is not evangelical Christendom's poster child which looks likes this:
Media_httpdanielmrose_ogyap
I love the fact that this is not mine.  I love that it's Zak's!  For an idea to become mission it requires ownership.  Who owns your ideas?  Are you giving it away?

Busy is the New Lazy!

Media_httpdanielmrose_gbhxx
What do you think of when you consider laziness?  My guess is you almost immediately think about some college kid laying on a couch playing XBox or PS3 and skipping classes.  I would tend to agree with you (although when I did this it was a PS, I was not lazy, I was saving my energy!). Dan Allender in Leading With a Limp argues that busy is the new lazy. He says, "Being busy seems to be the polar opposite of laziness, but a busy person is not so much active as lost. (128)" Wow! That is a paradigm shifter. In the Matrix of Brokenness Allender argues that weariness is something that all leaders will face and they will respond with either fatalism or hope. Fatalism usually displays itself in the context busyness.  Hope comes when we find disillusionment in these lesser things that keep us busy. As we become disillusioned we turn toward that greater love, the Christ who called us initially and become bold in our declaration that he is best and lesser things must find their proper place. As I read this I could not help but think of Hebrews 4:
“Therefore, while the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us fear lest any of you should seem to have failed to reach it. For good news came to us just as to them, but the message they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united by faith with those who listened.For we who have believed enter that rest, as he has said, “As I swore in my wrath, ‘They shall not enter my rest,’” although his works were finished from the foundation of the world. For he has somewhere spoken of the seventh day in this way: “And God rested on the seventh day from all his works.” And again in this passage he said, “They shall not enter my rest.” Since therefore it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly received the good news failed to enter because of disobedience, again he appoints a certain day, “Today,” saying through David so long afterward, in the words already quoted, “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts.” For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on. So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God’s rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. Let us therefore strive to enter that rest, so that no one may fall by the same sort of disobedience. For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.” (Hebrews 4:1–12 ESV)
This is one of my favorite passages in the Scriptures because it subverts our conception of rest.  We think of rest being a good nap.  Rest is something that can only be found in the creation rhythm of our God as we embrace him in faith. When weariness hits we can become fatalistic and busy ourselves with lesser things.  On the flip we can embrace this Creator God and his rhythm and find rest which provides hope. I know this is a flaw in me.  There have been times in the recent past (not so much since I joined my current ministry team) where I have been weary of a direction or a situation and I determine to busy myself with the building of my own kingdom.  I get busy with minutiae and leave the greater good of vision casting, direction setting, and aligning because of the weariness that comes from dealing with those who struggle to "get it". I am learning that if I am overly "busy" then I am not pursuing the best.  As I look over the last few weeks of my calendar I see that it has been very full.  I know that I have experienced being tired.  However, it has not been busyness.  My tired feeling is an emptiness of serving and giving of the core of my being.  It's a good tired. It's a hopeful tired. I know that I am in process.  I also am thankful for people like Doug who understands the rhythm of the Creator and calls me to account. God has also given me a subversive Bride, Beast, and Princess who draw me into his rest. How about you? Are you experiencing fatalistic busyness or are you disillusioned with the lesser things?

I'm a Jerk.

Media_httpdanielmrose_qfufa
Jerk: a contemptibly naive, fatuous, foolish, or inconsequential person. I am one. How do I know? I know because in my life I have struggled with the feeling of betrayal. I think I have authentically experienced it. I think that I sometimes read different situations and think that betrayal is happening when it is not.  However, when I face the pain of betrayal or even the perceived pain of betrayal I become a jerk. Dan Allender in Leading With a Limp provides what I call the "Matrix of Brokenness". You can find it here.  Regarding the issue of betrayal Allender argues that narcissism is the negative response.  Where does this narcissistic response come from? It comes from envy (96). Envy grabs you and you respond with a narcissism that is ugly, in short, you become a jerk. When I read that and thought about it I was not sure if I agreed with this idea or not.  However, as I pondered a time over the last few years when I felt betrayed, my evaluation led me to the realization that my initial response was indeed narcissistic and was indeed narcissistic and fueled by envy. I was being evaluated for a leadership position that was being vacated by another person.  I had been in a similar leadership a few years before and in my estimation this would be a formality.  However, it turned out to be one of the most painful experiences I have endured.  I did not get the position.  I did, however, receive a large list of things that I was failing at in ministry, relationships, and perceived in my walk with God.  This list was delivered with the tact and grace of a sledge hammer.  Nonetheless, the evaluation was accurate in many ways.  My initial response was anger and a sense of betrayal. I wanted answers. I wanted to quit.  I stopped relating to God and turned inward.  I was so wrapped up in my own sense of self-confident awesomeness that I could not see how this was God's hand calling me to a new level and season of development. I would not have admitted it then but I was envious of whoever would take on the role that I was passed over for. In my mind this role was an amazing place to serve and lead.  From this role a leader would have influence regionally and nationally within the organization. I was envious that it would not be me. There was not anyone in place to take the role and this envy turned to an ever deepening narcissism. Clearly God needed to teach me. He has. He is. I am still learning this lesson.  I am learning how to respond to all this.  I am learning that often my perception of "betrayal" is nothing more than God using people to move me away from my self-centeredness. This is why the appropriate response to betrayal is gratitude.  I need to be thankful that I have the opportunity to grow closer and to enter more deeply into reliance on God. I am a jerk.  But I am not as much of a jerk as I used to be.